From 708abeea41b0e19a21bf3c2b33a9653643a6fcd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gator Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 17:50:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Do not call a continuation shot's missing frame a fault A shot that continues the previous one seeds from that shot's real last frame and correctly has no opening still of its own. Flagging it as a lost likeness was wrong and would send someone chasing a problem that is not there. Also distinguish a frame drawn after the fact from the one actually used at film time, so the audit trail does not imply a seed that was never sent. --- admin.html | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/admin.html b/admin.html index 3a64184..c8cbe6f 100644 --- a/admin.html +++ b/admin.html @@ -88,8 +88,17 @@ function shotHtml(s) { + 'opening frame' + '
opening frame → Veo
' - : '
no opening frame — Veo was given the ' - + 'written description only, so the likeness is invented
') + : (s.seed_used === 'previous last frame' || s.continues + ? '
continues from the previous shot’s ' + + 'real last frame, so it needs no opening still of its own
' + : '
no opening frame — Veo was given the ' + + 'written description only, so the likeness is invented
')) + // A frame can be drawn after the fact. Do not let it imply a seed that was + // never actually sent to Veo. + + (s.plate_url && s.seed_used === 'none' + ? '
this frame was drawn ' + + 'after filming — it was NOT used for the video above
' + : '') + '' + (s.prompt_sent ? '
Exact prompt sent
' + esc(s.prompt_sent) + '
'